0day.today - Biggest Exploit Database in the World.
Things you should know about 0day.today:
Administration of this site uses the official contacts. Beware of impostors!
- We use one main domain: http://0day.today
- Most of the materials is completely FREE
- If you want to purchase the exploit / get V.I.P. access or pay for any other service,
you need to buy or earn GOLD
Administration of this site uses the official contacts. Beware of impostors!
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
Please, beware of scammers!
Please, beware of scammers!
- Read the [ agreement ]
- Read the [ Submit ] rules
- Visit the [ faq ] page
- [ Register ] profile
- Get [ GOLD ]
- If you want to [ sell ]
- If you want to [ buy ]
- If you lost [ Account ]
- Any questions [ admin@0day.today ]
- Authorisation page
- Registration page
- Restore account page
- FAQ page
- Contacts page
- Publishing rules
- Agreement page
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
You can contact us by:
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
Apple iOS / macOS - Memory Corruption Due to Bad Bounds Checking in NSCharacterSet Coding for NSKeye
Author
Risk
[
Security Risk Medium
]0day-ID
Category
Date add
CVE
Platform
Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1168 The dump today has this list of iOS stuff: https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/cms/page_13205587.html Reading through this sounded interesting: """ Buffer Overflow caused by deserialization parsing error in Foundation library Sending a crafted NSArchiver object to any process that calls NSArchive unarchive method will result in a buffer overflow, allowing for ROP. """ So I've spent all day going through initWithCoder: implementations looking for heap corruption :) The unarchiving of NSCharacterSet will call NSCharacterSetCFCharacterSetCreateWithBitmapRepresentation If we pass a large bitmap we can get to the following call multiple times: while (length > 1) { annexSet = (CFMutableCharacterSetRef)__CFCSetGetAnnexPlaneCharacterSet(cset, *(bytes++)); Here's that function (from the quite old CF code, but the disassm still matches) CF_INLINE CFCharacterSetRef __CFCSetGetAnnexPlaneCharacterSet(CFCharacterSetRef cset, int plane) { __CFCSetAllocateAnnexForPlane(cset, plane); if (!__CFCSetAnnexBitmapGetPlane(cset->_annex->_validEntriesBitmap, plane)) { cset->_annex->_nonBMPPlanes[plane - 1] = (CFCharacterSetRef)CFCharacterSetCreateMutable(CFGetAllocator(cset)); __CFCSetAnnexBitmapSetPlane(cset->_annex->_validEntriesBitmap, plane); } return cset->_annex->_nonBMPPlanes[plane - 1]; } note the interesting [plane - 1], however if we just call this with plane = 0 first __CFCSetAllocateAnnexForPlane will set the _nonBMPPlanes to NULL rather than allocating it but if we supply a large enough bitmap such that we can call __CFCSetGetAnnexPlaneCharacterSet twice, passing 1 the first time and 0 the second time then we can reach: cset->_annex->_nonBMPPlanes[plane - 1] = (CFCharacterSetRef)CFCharacterSetCreateMutable(CFGetAllocator(cset)); with plane = 0 leading to writing a pointer to semi-controlled data one qword below the heap allocation _nonBMPPlanes. This PoC is just a crasher but it looks pretty exploitable. The wikileaks dump implies that this kind of bug can be exploited both via IPC and as a persistence mechanism where apps serialize objects to disk. If I come up with a better PoC for one of those avenues I'll attach it later. (note that the actual PoC object is in the other file (longer_patched.bin) tested on MacOS 10.12.3 (16D32) ################################################################################ A few notes on the relevance of these bugs: NSXPC uses the "secure" version of NSKeyedArchiver where the expected types have to be declared upfront by a message receiver. This restricts the NSXPC attack surface for these issues to either places where overly broad base classes are accepted (like NSObject) or to just those services which accept classes with vulnerable deserializers. There are also other services which use NSKeyedArchives in the "insecure" mode (where the receiver doesn't supply a class whitelist.) Some regular (not NSXPC) xpc services use these. In those cases you could use these bugs to escape sandboxes/escalate privileges. Lots of apps serialize application state to NSKeyedArchives and don't use secure coding providing an avenue for memory-corruption based persistence on iOS. Futhermore there seem to be a bunch of serialized archives on the iPhone which you can touch via the services exposed by lockdownd (over the USB cable) providing an avenue for "local" exploitation (jumping from a user's desktop/laptop to the phone.) The host computer would need to have a valid pairing record to do this without prompts. For example the following files are inside the AFC jail: egrep -Rn NSKeyedArchiver * Binary file Downloads/downloads.28.sqlitedb matches Binary file Downloads/downloads.28.sqlitedb-wal matches Binary file PhotoData/AlbumsMetadata/0F31509F-271A-45BA-9E1F-C6F7BC4A537F.foldermetadata matches Binary file PhotoData/FacesMetadata/NVP_HIDDENFACES.hiddenfacemetadata matches 00006890 | 24 76 65 72 73 69 6F 6E 58 24 6F 62 6A 65 63 74 | $versionX$object 000068A0 | 73 59 24 61 72 63 68 69 76 65 72 54 24 74 6F 70 | sY$archiverT$top Proof of Concept: https://github.com/offensive-security/exploit-database-bin-sploits/raw/master/sploits/42049.zip # 0day.today [2024-11-15] #