0day.today - Biggest Exploit Database in the World.
- We use one main domain: http://0day.today
- Most of the materials is completely FREE
- If you want to purchase the exploit / get V.I.P. access or pay for any other service,
you need to buy or earn
GOLD
Administration of this site uses the official contacts. Beware of impostors!
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!Please, beware of scammers!
- Read the [ agreement ]
- Read the [ Submit ] rules
- Visit the [ faq ] page
- [ Register ] profile
- Get [ GOLD ]
- If you want to [ sell ]
- If you want to [ buy ]
- If you lost [ Account ]
- Any questions [ admin@0day.today ]
- Authorisation page
- Registration page
- Restore account page
- FAQ page
- Contacts page
- Publishing rules
- Agreement page
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
Contact us
You can contact us by:
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
Wireshark 2.0.0 < 2.0.4 / 1.12.0 < 1.12.12 - PacketBB Dissector Denial of Service
Author
Risk
[Security Risk Medium
]0day-ID
Category
Date add
CVE
Platform
Sample generated by AFL
Build Information:
TShark 1.12.9 (v1.12.9-0-gfadb421 from (HEAD)
Copyright 1998-2015 Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled (64-bit) with GLib 2.48.1, with libpcap, with libz 1.2.8, with POSIX
capabilities (Linux), with libnl 3, without SMI, with c-ares 1.11.0, without
Lua, without Python, with GnuTLS 3.4.13, with Gcrypt 1.7.1, with MIT Kerberos,
with GeoIP.
Running on Linux 4.6.2-1-ARCH, with locale en_US.utf8, with libpcap version
1.7.4, with libz 1.2.8.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @ 2.50GHz
--
This issue was uncovered with AFL (http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/)
The attached sample evokes a divide-by-zero error in the dissect_pbb_tlvblock() function at packet-packetbb.c:289.
The variable of interest seems to be 'c' which is set at packet-packetbb.c:285 using two other variables and an addition. When c is zero, the expression "length/c" at packet-packetbb.c:289 results in a divide-by-zero error.
Divide-by-zero has been observed when sample is parsed by tshark versions 1.12.8, 1.12.9, 1.12.10, 1.12.12, and 2.0.4 among others.
Credit goes to Chris Benedict, Aurelien Delaitre, NIST SAMATE Project, https://samate.nist.gov
Proof of Concept:
https://github.com/offensive-security/exploit-database-bin-sploits/raw/master/sploits/40197.zip
# 0day.today [2024-12-24] #