0day.today - Biggest Exploit Database in the World.
- We use one main domain: http://0day.today
- Most of the materials is completely FREE
- If you want to purchase the exploit / get V.I.P. access or pay for any other service,
you need to buy or earn
GOLD
Administration of this site uses the official contacts. Beware of impostors!
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!Please, beware of scammers!
- Read the [ agreement ]
- Read the [ Submit ] rules
- Visit the [ faq ] page
- [ Register ] profile
- Get [ GOLD ]
- If you want to [ sell ]
- If you want to [ buy ]
- If you lost [ Account ]
- Any questions [ admin@0day.today ]
- Authorisation page
- Registration page
- Restore account page
- FAQ page
- Contacts page
- Publishing rules
- Agreement page
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
Contact us
You can contact us by:
Mail:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Telegram:
We DO NOT use Telegram or any messengers / social networks!
gsview -dSAFER Not Used Vulnerability
[gsview: -dSAFER not used I was planning to test the exploit for <a href="/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1640" title="ghostscript: multiple critical vulnerabilities, including remote command execution" class="closed_ref" rel="nofollow"> bug 1640 </a> against gsview, the official ghostscript viewer, but it turns out systemdict /SAFER get returns false. That means opening a file in gsview is equivalent to running arbitrary code, the obvious attack is doing something like: (C:/Users/foo/Start Menu/Startup/exploit.bat) (w) file dup (calc.exe) writestring closefile I don't think it's clear from the documentation that you cannot open untrusted files, and I can't find any configuration setting to enable the SAFER sandbox. This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse or a patch has been made broadly available (whichever is earlier), the bug report will become visible to the public. # 0day.today [2024-11-14] #